Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    If pain's badness is both universally objective and stanc... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Truth & Knowledge
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Stance-independence is not a necessary condition for the objectivity of moral truth.

    If pain's badness is both universally objective and stance-dependent, then objectivity does not entail stance-independence.

    Truth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Truth & Knowledge

    Connections

    2 topics

    Consciousness & Mind1 linkedMoral Responsibility1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Truth & Knowledge
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Related

    Physical pain is plausibly considered universally bad for the person experiencin...Stance-independence is not a necessary condition for the objectivity of moral tr...The intrinsic badness of pain for the person suffering it is a stance-dependent ...

    Similar

    Physical pain is universally bad and authority-independent, satisfying...89%Yet physical pain's badness is arguably stance-dependent.88%The intrinsic badness of pain for the person suffering it is a stance-...88%The intrinsic badness of pain for the person who has it is a stance-de...85%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: moral-epistemology
    View source passageHide passage
    There are two ways to go if one wishes to defend the possibility of moral knowledge against the argument from moral objectivism. One is to reject the concept of stance-independent objectivity as a necessary condition on moral truth. Studies show that even young children after a certain age make an intuitive distinction between conventional demands and moral demands (Nichols 2004). Basic moral demands unlike conventional ones are taken to be independent of authority (for example, that of a teache

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective