Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    If parallel algorithms achieve speedup only at the cost o... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Parallel speedup via PRAM is practically significant only if the number of processors required is polynomial, not exponential, in input size

    If parallel algorithms achieve speedup only at the cost of exponentially many processors relative to input size, there is little hope of building a concrete computing device to implement them

    Modality & PossibilitySkepticism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismModality & Possibility

    Key Terms

    Concrete computing device(as used in computer science and philosophy of technology)
    An actual, physical machine or computer that you can build and use in the real world, as opposed to something that only works in theory.
    Exponentially many(as used in mathematics and computer science)
    A number that grows extremely fast—doubling or more with each increase—so that it quickly becomes impossibly large (like 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 1024...).
    Input size

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    (as used in computer science)
    How much data or how many items a program needs to process; for example, the number of items in a list you're sorting.
    Parallel algorithms(as used in computer science)
    Step-by-step instructions for solving a problem where many tasks happen at the same time instead of one after another, like having multiple workers tackle different parts of a job simultaneously.
    Processors(as used in computer science)
    The computing chips or units that actually do the calculations and execute instructions in a computer.
    Speedup(as used in computer science)
    How much faster a computation gets done when you use multiple processors working together compared to using just one.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Proof of definition segments2 linkedTruth & Knowledge1 linked

    Related

    NC is defined to require only polynomially many processorsParallel speedup via PRAM is practically significant only if the number of proce...

    Similar

    If a parallel algorithm achieves speedup only by employing exponential...98%If parallel speedup requires exponentially many processors relative to...95%If a parallel algorithm requires exponentially many processors relativ...94%Parallel algorithms that achieve speedup only by employing exponential...89%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: computational-complexity
    View source passageHide passage
    3 Parallel, probabilistic, and quantum complexity Even taking into account our current inability to resolve Open Questions 1–3, the hierarchy of complexity classes depicted in Figure 2 ranging from \(\textbf{P}\) to \(\textbf{EXP}\) represent the most robust benchmarks of computational difficulty now available. Beyond this hierarchy a wide array of additional classes are also studied which are believed to demarcate additional structure either inside \(\textbf{P}\) or between \(\textbf{P}\) and \

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective