Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If physical indeterminism is coherent and empirically well-supported, the PSR cannot hold as a universal metaphysical necessity.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Quantum indeterminism describes epistemic limits in measurement, not proof of metaphysical explanation-free events; PSR remains compatible.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
PSR might hold at fundamental levels while allowing apparent indeterminism at macro scales; coherence doesn't require universal application.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Indeterminism's coherence doesn't establish its truth; empirical support for standard QM remains contested among interpretations.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Quantum mechanics provides empirically robust evidence of genuinely indeterministic physical events without sufficient prior causes.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A universal PSR would require every quantum event to have an explanation, but indeterminism entails some events lack sufficient reasons.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Coherence requires PSR apply universally or not at all; selective application undermines its status as metaphysical necessity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.