Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If Plato grants that some myths contain truth, the criterion distinguishing mythic truth from mythic falsehood remains internal to the myth's own logic.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Plato explicitly critiques Homer and Hesiod for false mythological claims, implying he uses standards external to myth's own logic.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
An internal-only criterion makes mythic truth unfalsifiable: any narrative consistent with itself becomes true by definition, undermining rationality.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Plato anchors myths to Forms and dialectical truth, suggesting mythic validity requires alignment with objective metaphysical standards outside the myth.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Myths operate by internal coherence: a myth's truth-value depends on consistency within its own narrative world and symbolic system.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Plato distinguishes myths serving philosophical ends (noble lies) from false myths, suggesting he applies standards internal to mythic purpose.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
External criteria (empirical verification, logical formalism) are inapplicable to myths, which traffic in non-literal, analogical meaning.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.