Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If propositions were the sole objects of belief, co-referential terms would be interchangeable in belief contexts without affecting truth value.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Frege's puzzle shows 'Hesperus' and 'Phosphorus' have identical referents but different cognitive significance in belief.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Belief requires a mode of presentation or conceptual path to the object, not merely the proposition itself.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The permutation of co-referential terms can change believed propositions when those terms carry distinct epistemic properties.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Propositions are abstract, language-independent entities that capture semantic content exhaustively.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If two terms refer to identical objects, they express the same proposition regardless of how reference occurs.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Substitution failures in belief contexts indicate the presence of non-propositional elements like modes of presentation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.