If Pryor's dogmatism is coherent, then Q8 is not collateral information but rather a consequence derivable from perceptual justification, making Moore's proof transmissive after all.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
coherent(de Finetti's usage in the context of the Dutch Book argument for probabilism)
A subject is coherent if their unconditional degrees of belief do not permit a Dutch Book (a guaranteed loss through a combination of bets) to be made against them
perceptual justification(epistemology)
Reasons for believing something that come from what you directly see, hear, or sense with your own eyes and ears.