Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If Psillos's 'no reason to doubt' condition is added with... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Psillos's additional condition for valid rule-circular arguments is not clearly justified.

    If Psillos's 'no reason to doubt' condition is added without derivation from independent epistemological principles, it constitutes an ad hoc constraint.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Ad hoc constraints lack principled justification and serve only to protect a favored theory from counterexamples.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Epistemological principles should derive from general criteria of justification, not be tailored to specific philosophical disputes.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If Psillos's condition isn't grounded in independent epistemology, it appears designed solely to salvage scientific realism.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Context-specific constraints can be legitimate when addressing particular debates without requiring universal epistemological derivation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The demand for independent derivation may itself be an underfunded methodological assumption rather than a principled requirement.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Psillos's condition could reflect tacit epistemological commitments already embedded in scientific practice, not requiring explicit derivation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedSkepticism1 linked

    Related

    Ad hoc constraints lack principled justification and serve only to protect a fav...Context-specific constraints can be legitimate when addressing particular debate...Epistemological principles should derive from general criteria of justification,...If Psillos's condition isn't grounded in independent epistemology, it appears de...
    +3 moreShow less
    Psillos's additional condition for valid rule-circular arguments is not clearly ...Psillos's condition could reflect tacit epistemological commitments already embe...The demand for independent derivation may itself be an underfunded methodologica...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit