Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If PSR applies to necessary truths via the principle of k... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The Principle of Sufficient Reason governs the domain of contingent truths

    If PSR applies to necessary truths via the principle of knowing (principium rationis cognoscendi), then restricting PSR to contingency misrepresents its actual scope.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Necessary truths (e.g., mathematical axioms) demand explanation via their conceptual grounds, not just contingent facts.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The principium rationis cognoscendi correctly identifies that knowing why something is true requires a reason, regardless of its modal status.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Restricting PSR to contingency arbitrarily exempts necessary truths from rational scrutiny, creating an explanatory gap.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Necessary truths are self-explaining through their logical structure; they need no external reason beyond their own necessity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Conflating epistemic reasons (how we know) with metaphysical grounds (why something exists) obscures the original PSR's intent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.PSR's traditional scope—explaining contingent existence—remains coherent without extending to necessary truths' deeper justification.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedModality & Possibility1 linked

    Related

    Conflating epistemic reasons (how we know) with metaphysical grounds (why someth...Necessary truths (e.g., mathematical axioms) demand explanation via their concep...Necessary truths are self-explaining through their logical structure; they need ...PSR's traditional scope—explaining contingent existence—remains coherent without...
    +3 moreShow less
    Restricting PSR to contingency arbitrarily exempts necessary truths from rationa...The Principle of Sufficient Reason governs the domain of contingent truthsThe principium rationis cognoscendi correctly identifies that knowing why someth...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit