Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If pure consciousness has no intentionality, it cannot have an intentional object, undermining the definition of pariniṣpanna via intentional content.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Intentionality need not imply external objects; self-aware consciousness exhibits intentionality toward its own nature.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Pariniṣpanna can be defined via its own intrinsic structure rather than relational intentional content alone.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The claim conflates 'no intentionality' with 'no intentional object,' but these are logically distinct properties.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Intentionality requires a subject-object duality; pure consciousness transcends this duality by definition.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If pariniṣpanna is defined solely through intentional content, it becomes dependent on mental acts, contradicting its status as ultimate reality.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Non-intentional awareness aligns with Yogacara descriptions of pariniṣpanna as the cessation of subject-object construction.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.