Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If purely inferential introduction and elimination rules ... — Carmelics
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The quantifier W counts as a logical constant if and only if the existential quantifier ∃ counts as a logical constant

    If purely inferential introduction and elimination rules fix a semantic value for ∃, then analogous rules fix the same semantic value for W

    Modality & PossibilityPhilosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageModality & Possibility

    Connections

    1 topic

    Truth & Knowledge3 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    If logical constants are expressions whose semantic values can be fixed by purel...The introduction and elimination rules R' for W are no less purely inferential t...The quantifier W counts as a logical constant if and only if the existential qua...W has the same semantic value as ∃ because there are no male widows

    Similar

    The introduction and elimination rules R' for W are no less purely inf...89%If logical constants are expressions whose semantic values can be fixe...81%Any formally suitable introduction rule can fix the meaning for a logi...79%Hacking's account defines logical constants as expressions whose seman...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: logical-constants
    View source passageHide passage
    The notion of determination of semantic value in a well-defined semantic framework is, at least, clear—unlike the general notion of determination of sense. However, as Gómez-Torrente points out, by concentrating on the fixation of reference (or semantic value) rather than sense, Hacking opens himself up to an objection not unlike the objection to permutation-invariance approaches we considered above (see also Sainsbury 2001, 369). Consider the quantifier \(\dq{W}\), which means “not for all not

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective