If QALY weights were recalibrated using experiential rather than evaluative preferences, the alleged systematic disadvantage to disabled persons would be substantially diminished or eliminated.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Evaluative preferences(as used in ethics and decision-making): What people think is valuable or good based on abstract judgment or principles, rather than what they actually experience as enjoyable or satisfying.
Experiential preferences(as used in ethics and decision-making): What people actually prefer based on how they experience or live their lives day-to-day, rather than what they think they *should* prefer in theory.
QALY (Quality-Adjusted Life Year)(as used in healthcare ethics and resource allocation): A way of measuring health benefits that combines how long someone lives with how good their quality of life is during that time—essentially trying to put a number on health improvements.
Recalibrated(as used in measurement and evaluation): Adjusted or reset to use different measurements or standards than before.

Based on where you are in your exploration