Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that If rational choice is defined by conformity to what will happen, deliberation becomes superfluous, undermining the very agency that makes choice rational.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Deliberation can be rational even if it reliably produces predetermined outcomes; the process matters independently of its causal novelty.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Defining rationality by conformity to outcomes doesn't assume determinism—it's compatible with choices that remain causally efficacious.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Agency requires competent reasoning, not metaphysical openness; deliberation demonstrates this competence even within constrained circumstances.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Agency requires the ability to make choices that could have gone otherwise; if outcomes are predetermined, alternatives are illusory.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Deliberation is only meaningful when it can causally influence outcomes; conformity to inevitable events removes this causal efficacy.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Rational choice assumes the chooser's reasoning matters; defining it by conformity to what will happen makes reasoning epiphenomenal.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.