If real distinctions are intelligible for creatures, the burden of proof falls on the divine simplicity theorist to show why analogicalextension of such distinctions to God is categorically blocked rather than merely inappropriate.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
burden of proof(Used to frame the default presumption against coercive institutional structures.)
The obligation on institutions employing authority, hierarchy, or domination to demonstrate that such arrangements are justified given existing conditions.
divine simplicity(Central to both Malebranche's theodicy and his epistemology)
A divine attribute functioning as a side constraint on God's actions, requiring God to act through simple means.