Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If reason is merely a slave to the passions, the will cannot be identified with practical reason itself.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Passions themselves incorporate rational judgment—desires involve evaluative beliefs, so reason and passion are not cleanly separable.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The will might be constituted by integrated reasoning about what matters to us, including our affective commitments and values.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Even if reason serves passions, this doesn't negate the will's reality; it may simply show the will emerges from unified rational-affective deliberation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
If reason merely serves passion, it lacks autonomy and cannot constitute genuine will, which requires independent rational self-governance.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The will is defined by rational deliberation about ends, not mere instrumental calculation for predetermined passions.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
A being whose reason is enslaved to passions acts from external determination, not from the self-directed agency constitutive of will.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.