Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If reductionism about personal identity is true, personal... — Carmelics
    Home/Personal Identity
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The separateness of persons objection to utilitarianism is not serious, because the metaphysical distinction between persons that the objection relies on is not a deep fact.

    If reductionism about personal identity is true, personal identity is not a further fact — it is not a deep metaphysical fact.

    Personal Identity
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Personal Identity

    Connections

    2 topics

    Consequentialism3 linkedMoral Responsibility1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Personal Identity
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Related

    A distinction that is not grounded in a deep fact is not a distinction worth tak...The non-identity of different persons depends on the further fact of personal id...The separateness of persons objection depends on a hard-and-fast metaphysical di...The separateness of persons objection to utilitarianism is not serious, because ...

    Similar

    Reductionism about personal identity holds that the non-identity of pe...90%Utilitarians may coherently be reductionists about personal identity.85%The non-identity of different persons depends on the further fact of p...82%If psychological continuity is the basis of personal identity (Parfit'...81%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: identity-ethics
    View source passageHide passage
    First, one might identify a serious objection to utilitarianism, say, and then show how considerations of personal identity (or at least of what matters in identity) dissolve the objection. This is the approach Parfit takes in Reasons and Persons. The objection he is concerned to refute is Rawls' famous “separateness of persons” charge, the contention that utilitarianism fails to take seriously the distinction between persons, because it controversially jettisons interpersonal distributive

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective