Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If reliability cannot survive Gettier-style counterexamples, it is not a genuine requirement of knowledge but merely a contingent correlate.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Gettier cases may reveal defects in reliability theories rather than prove reliability isn't essential to knowledge.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Many genuine requirements fail in edge cases; surviving counterexamples is too stringent a criterion for essentiality.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Reliability could be necessary for knowledge even if reliabilist definitions need refinement to handle Gettier problems.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Gettier cases show reliable processes can produce false beliefs, proving reliability alone doesn't constitute knowledge.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Essential features of knowledge must survive all counterexamples; contingent correlates can fail in edge cases.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
If reliability were genuinely required, Gettier subjects with reliable faculties wouldn't lack knowledge in those cases.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.