If reminiscence and passive reflection can constitute genuine categorical desires, then the supportingargument's privileging of forward-looking pursuits begs the question against a different but equally coherent life structure.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
begs the question(Informal fallacy in epistemic justification)
A circular argument in which warrant for the premises already presupposes the truth of the conclusion
coherent(de Finetti's usage in the context of the Dutch Book argument for probabilism)
A subject is coherent if their unconditional degrees of belief do not permit a Dutch Book (a guaranteed loss through a combination of bets) to be made against them