Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If respect requires the suppression of sensuous impulses ... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The key difference between Kant and Hume on moral motivation is that Kant believes pure reason can produce a motivationally efficacious feeling (respect), while Hume denies pure reason has any such capacity.

    If respect requires the suppression of sensuous impulses as a causal precondition, Hume could grant this mechanism without conceding that pure reason alone is motivationally efficacious.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Hume's empiricism allows that reason can recognize conditions enabling respect without requiring reason itself to be the ultimate motivator.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Suppressing sensuous impulses could be causally necessary for respect while originating from sentiment or passion, not pure reason.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A mechanistic account of respect's preconditions is compatible with sentimentalist motivation if reason merely identifies those conditions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.If suppression requires overriding immediate sensuous desires, some rational principle must explain why that override occurs—a rationalist burden.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Distinguishing 'identifying a mechanism' from 'motivating through that mechanism' obscures rather than resolves the efficacy question at stake.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Hume's own account of calm passions suggests reason influences motivation indirectly, conceding more rationalist efficacy than the claim preserves.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    Hume(as the main philosopher discussed in this statement)
    David Hume was an 18th-century Scottish philosopher who argued that human knowledge comes from experience and observation rather than pure reasoning alone.
    Motivationally efficacious(describing whether respect can actually make us act morally)
    Capable of actually causing someone to want to do something or feel inspired to act—not just being a nice idea, but something that actually moves you to behave a certain way.
    Pure Reason
    # Pure Reason Pure reason is the human ability to think and understand the world using only our mind, without relying on information from our senses or personal experience. It's the kind of thinking we use when we do math, follow logical arguments, or figure out what *must* be true based on basic principles alone. The term comes from philosopher Immanuel Kant, who argued that some knowledge comes from pure reason (like mathematics) while other knowledge requires us to actually observe the world around us.
    causal precondition(as a logical requirement)
    Something that must happen first in order to cause something else to happen—like needing a spark to cause a fire.
    respect(Kant's moral philosophy; distinguished from mere inclination)
    A feeling that arises from reason in response to the moral law, which plays a role in human moral motivation alongside pure reason
    suppression of sensuous impulses(as a moral requirement)
    Holding back or controlling your physical desires and pleasures (like hunger, comfort, or immediate gratification) in order to do what's right.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Virtue Ethics1 linkedMoral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    A mechanistic account of respect's preconditions is compatible with sentimentali...Distinguishing 'identifying a mechanism' from 'motivating through that mechanism...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    Hume's empiricism allows that reason can recognize conditions enabling respect w...
    Hume's own account of calm passions suggests reason influences motivation indire...
    +3 moreShow less
    If suppression requires overriding immediate sensuous desires, some rational pri...Suppressing sensuous impulses could be causally necessary for respect while orig...The key difference between Kant and Hume on moral motivation is that Kant believ...