Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If ritual arises in response to already-diminished naturalness, then ritual is an effect of corrosion rather than its source, reversing the causal claim.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Rituals exist in all known societies including hunter-gatherers with minimal environmental disruption, suggesting independent origin.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Causality may be bidirectional: ritual both responds to and actively reinforces naturalness loss through feedback loops, not pure effect.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The claim conflates ritual's function (compensation) with its origin (which could be evolutionary/cognitive rather than corrosive).
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Anthropological evidence shows rituals emerge in cultures after ecological disruption or social fragmentation, not before.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If ritual were causal in eroding naturalness, pre-ritual societies would show less natural behavior—but they historically show more.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Rituals explicitly compensate for lost spontaneity (e.g., formal greetings replace natural social bonding), indicating downstream origin.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.