Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If robots handle care tasks, fewer human carers may be ne... — Carmelics
    Home/Bioethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The primary risk of robots in care settings is the reduction of intentional human care, not dehumanisation per se

    If robots handle care tasks, fewer human carers may be needed

    BioethicsConsequentialism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    BioethicsConsequentialism

    Connections

    1 topic

    Moral Responsibility2 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Bioethics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Human carers provide intentional care that robots cannot replicateReduced human presence means reduced intentional care for patientsThe primary risk of robots in care settings is the reduction of intentional huma...

    Similar

    These robots are 'care robots' only in the behavioural sense of perfor...88%Human carers provide intentional care that robots cannot replicate88%Foreseeable care robots do not provide care in the morally or experien...84%Foreseeable robots cannot provide intentional care84%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: ethics-ai
    View source passageHide passage
    One reason why the issue of care has come to the fore is that people have argued that we will need robots in ageing societies. This argument makes problematic assumptions, namely that with longer lifespan people will need more care, and that it will not be possible to attract more humans to caring professions. It may also show a bias about age (Jecker forthcoming). Most importantly, it ignores the nature of automation, which is not simply about replacing humans, but about allowing humans to work

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective