Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If Schema 2 claims more than probability, it must be eith... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Schema 2 would not be vulnerable to the ills of analogy and would claim more than mere probability for its conclusion.

    If Schema 2 claims more than probability, it must be either analytic or synthetic a priori, but Kant's transcendental dialectic shows neither route yields sound theological conclusions.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Kant(as used in epistemology and metaphysics)
    Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) was an influential German philosopher who argued that our minds shape how we experience reality, and that we can only truly know things as they appear to us, not as they are in themselves.
    Schema 2(as a philosophical construct being evaluated)
    A specific logical framework or pattern being discussed in a philosophical argument; think of it like a template that the philosopher is testing to see if it works.
    Theological conclusions(the religious positions Ibn Daud arrives at in his thinking)
    Beliefs about God and religion that someone reaches based on their reasoning or arguments.
    Transcendental Dialectic(Critique of Pure Reason)
    The part of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason in which he argues against the Leibniz-Wolffian claim that humans have a priori knowledge of the soul, world-whole, and God.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    a priori(Frege treats 'analytic' as entailing 'a priori' for arithmetic.)
    Knowable independently of empirical experience; here treated as a consequence of analyticity.
    analytic(Used to establish that males exist if bachelors exist)
    A sentence or truth that holds in virtue of meaning alone, such that the predicate is contained in the subject concept.
    synthetic a priori(Kant's Critique of Pure Reason; Euclidean geometry is offered as a primary example)
    A class of statements that are both independent of experience and non-tautological, combining the necessity of a priori knowledge with the informativeness of synthetic judgment

    Connections

    1 topic

    Natural Theology1 linked

    Related

    Schema 2 would not be vulnerable to the ills of analogy and would claim more tha...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective