Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If self-predication is banished, Russell's paradox cannot... — Carmelics
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→A type-theoretical formal property theory can be constructed that avoids Russell's paradox

    If self-predication is banished, Russell's paradox cannot even be formulated

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    A type-theoretical formal property theory can be constructed that avoids Russell...If a predicate can be predicated of another predicate only when the former is of...Russell's paradox depends on the possibility of self-predication

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    Russell's paradox depends on the possibility of self-predication90%Forms either allow self-predication or they do not.83%Bertrand's paradox provides no conclusive reason against the Indiffere...80%Russell's paradox can be formulated without relying on Excluded Middle80%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: properties
    View source passageHide passage
    Standard second-order logic allows for predicate variables bound by quantifiers. Hence, to the extent that these variables are taken to range over properties, this system could be seen as a formal theory of properties. Its expressive power is however limited, since it does not allow for subject terms that stand for properties. Thus, for example, one cannot even say of a property \(F\) that \(F = F\). This is a serious limitation if one wants a formal tool for a realm of properties whose laws one

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective