If skeptical conclusions are context-relative, the CP-based argument establishes only that knowledge-attribution standards shift, not that we genuinely lack knowledge of the external world.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

CP-based argument(epistemology): An argument based on a principle or theory abbreviated as 'CP' (likely referring to a specific philosophical framework; without more context, it's a reference to another philosophical work or principle).
context-relative(philosophy of language and epistemology): Something that changes meaning or truth depending on the specific situation or circumstances you're in.
external world(Descartes' Sixth Meditation, where the external world is not equivalent to the material world): The domain of objects existing independently of the meditator's mind, which may include both immaterial beings (God) and material bodies
knowledge(Distinguished from mere true belief, which may be the product of indoctrination and need not exercise deliberative capacities.): Justified true belief — true belief that has been arrived at through the exercise of deliberative capacities, including comparison of and deliberation among alternatives.

Based on where you are in your exploration