Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If soft past facts are causable via the future free acts they are about, then past events cannot be uniformly excluded from the class of causable events.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Soft facts are not genuine facts about the past; they are about future contingencies, so backward causation doesn't actually occur.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Semantic dependence (soft facts depend on future truth) differs fundamentally from causal dependence and doesn't establish causation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Even granting soft facts are causable, this is compatible with excluding hard past events from causability—a meaningful distinction remains.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Soft facts about the past (e.g., 'it was true that X would happen') depend on future free acts for their truth conditions.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If soft facts depend on future free acts, then those future acts causally determine whether soft past facts obtain.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Once causation can flow from future to past via soft facts, the principle excluding all past events from causability collapses.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.