Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If soul-making requires suffering, this implies a constraint on divine creative power incompatible with classical omnipotence.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Omnipotence need not include power over logical impossibilities; soul-making through suffering may be metaphysically necessary, not a constraint.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A world with soul-making suffering could contain greater overall good than a world with virtue but no spiritual depth or meaningful choice.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Divine omnipotence and constraint are compatible if constraint is self-imposed for purpose; God may limit power to achieve higher goods.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Omnipotence means power to do all logically possible things; creating virtue without struggle is logically impossible, not a power limit.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If God could create morally mature souls without suffering, divine benevolence would require doing so rather than permitting vast suffering.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Classical omnipotence includes power over one's own creative constraints; accepting suffering as necessary contradicts unlimited creative freedom.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.