Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that If space and time ground the possibility of motion, they cannot derive their existence or distinguishability from motion without vicious circularity.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Grounding can be mutual or co-constitutive; A grounds B and B grounds A without viciousness if their mutual dependence is explanatorily basic.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Space, time, and motion might all be grounded in a deeper reality (e.g., fields, events), avoiding circularity between them.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Distinguishability of space and time need not require explanation by motion; topological or metric structure suffices independently.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Grounding relations require asymmetric dependence: the ground cannot depend on what it grounds without circular explanation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Space and time appear to be necessary conditions for motion's intelligibility, suggesting they are foundational rather than derivative.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If motion individuates space and time, then space and time's identity depends on motion, making them not truly fundamental.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.