Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If space is originally given as a whole, synthesis is required only to carve out determinate parts, not to constitute the whole itself.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Consciousness only accesses space through determinate representations; claims about 'original wholes' exceed what we can justify.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Geometry and physics treat space as constructed through relational definitions, not given as a pre-existing totality.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The distinction between 'given as a whole' and 'synthesized into parts' lacks clear empirical or logical criteria.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Infinite divisibility of space suggests a pre-existing continuum; parts cannot be synthesized from nothing into a unified whole.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Perceptual experience presents space holistically before attention isolates determinate regions within it.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
If synthesis constituted space itself, an infinite regress would occur—we'd need prior synthesis to enable that synthesis.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.