Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If spatial relations are constituted by the distribution of matter, then no coherent spatial 'beyond' exists for a hand or stick to occupy.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Spatial relations could be fundamental features of reality, not derivative from matter—matter merely instantiates them.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Mathematical spaces exist coherently as abstract structures independent of physical matter; hands/sticks occupy real instantiations of these.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Even relationalism allows space 'beyond' matter: the logical possibility of further matter positions defines extended space structurally.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Space is relationally constituted by matter's distribution; absent matter, spatial coordinates become meaningless abstractions.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A 'beyond' requires determinate spatial position; if position depends on matter-configuration, beyond-matter-space lacks determination.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Physics describes space through mass-energy distribution; no independent spatial framework exists prior to or apart from matter.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.