Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If Strawson is correct, then 'Pedro's sister' in a context without prior discourse referent produces presupposition failure, not successful accommodation.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Hearers routinely accommodate novel presuppositions without prior discourse (e.g., 'The king of France is bald'), suggesting accommodation is default.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Strawson's presupposition failure predicts odd truth-value judgments; empirical evidence shows speakers evaluate such utterances straightforwardly.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Discourse context matters in degrees, not binary presence/absence; 'Pedro's sister' triggers accommodation in new contexts as readily as established ones.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Strawson argued that presuppositions fail when their truth conditions cannot be evaluated, not when hearers simply lack information.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Accommodation requires hearers to actively adopt new content; without prior discourse, no natural accommodation mechanism triggers.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Definite descriptions like 'Pedro's sister' semantically presuppose uniqueness and familiarity, both absent in null contexts.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.