Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If success is itself theory-laden, then justifying analog... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The success-based justification of Pythagorean analogical reasoning is inadequate

    If success is itself theory-laden, then justifying analogical reasoning by appeal to past success is viciously circular in the manner Sextus Empiricus identified in criterion-based justification.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Criterion-based justification(the type of justification problem Sextus Empiricus identified)
    A way of proving something is true by using a standard or rule to measure it—like using a test to check if a coin is real.
    Sextus Empiricus(the source being cited for information about Stoic signs)
    An ancient Greek philosopher (around 200 CE) who documented skeptical arguments and different philosophical schools' ideas in his writings.
    Theory-laden(in epistemology (theory of knowledge))
    Already shaped by or dependent on particular assumptions and theories you've already accepted, rather than being purely objective or neutral.
    analogical reasoning(Philosophy of inductive reasoning)
    A form of inference that has been analyzed as generalization from a single case, as a sampling argument, or as a distinctive argument form supported by past successes

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    justification(Third condition of the tripartite account of knowledge)
    The condition on a knower's belief that excludes mere luck — the belief must be held in a way that is appropriate or warranted, not merely accidentally correct.
    viciously circular(Applied to Descartes' Third Meditation argument structure)
    A form of reasoning in which the conclusion is presupposed among the premises used to demonstrate it

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedSkepticism1 linked

    Related

    The success-based justification of Pythagorean analogical reasoning is inadequat...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective