Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If synderesis were a potentiality, it could fail to incline toward good, but Aquinas explicitly denies synderesis ever errs or is extinguished.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
If synderesis is actualized in cognition, it seems epistemically subject to the same errors as other intellectual habits.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Psychopaths and moral agents with inverted values seem empirically to lack synderesis's inclinatory force, contradicting infallibility.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Distinguishing synderesis (inerrantly right) from practical reason (fallible) creates an explanatory gap Aquinas doesn't adequately bridge.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Synderesis as innate habitus (not potentiality) explains why it's inerrantly oriented to good without requiring actualization.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If synderesis could fail, practical reasoning would lack a stable first principle, making moral knowledge impossible.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Aquinas's denial of synderesis's failure parallels divine immutability—a necessary anchor for objective moral truth.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42