Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If teleological theories can be fully naturalized, their apparent commitment to evaluative facts dissolves into descriptive claims about natural states.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Naturalization describes how systems work mechanistically, but doesn't eliminate the normativity of 'should function this way' claims.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Facts about natural purposes (e.g., heart's function) seem conceptually distinct from descriptive regularities—explanation requires evaluative framing.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Complete naturalization requires reducing normativity itself, not just explaining systems; this reduction may be conceptually impossible or circular.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Natural selection explains goal-directed behavior without invoking purposes, reducing teleology to mechanistic processes describable in physics.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If evaluative facts were irreducible, they would require non-natural properties, violating physicalism accepted in successful sciences.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Organizational states (e.g., homeostasis) can be fully characterized descriptively without referencing values or normativity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.