Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If the agent can give the behavior as intentional under s... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Behavior caused by beliefs and desires in a deviant causal chain is not an action but mere behavior.

    If the agent can give the behavior as intentional under some description and that description matches the operative belief-desire pair, the causal pathway's deviance does not strip the behavior of action-status.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Action requires agent self-understanding: if an agent can describe their behavior intentionally, this demonstrates requisite agency regardless of causal mechanics.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Deviant causal chains still realize the agent's intentions: when beliefs and desires produce behavior matching their content, the agent succeeded in acting.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Restricting action to 'normal' causation arbitrarily excludes cases where agents control behavior through their actual mental states.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Agent description cannot override objective causal facts: self-interpretation doesn't change whether intentions actually produced the behavior or merely accompanied it.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.This view risks making too much count as action: any behavior an agent can rationalize becomes action, collapsing the distinction between action and mere happening.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Matching descriptions to beliefs/desires is necessary but insufficient: a climber whose trembling triggers a grip that saves him has matching descriptions but no action.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    Intentional(as a dimension of human intelligence)
    The quality of mental states being 'about' something—when you think about pizza, your thought points to or represents pizza; this directedness toward something is called intentionality.
    action-status(in action theory)
    Whether something counts as a real, intentional action or just a side effect that happened to occur.
    agent(Economics terminology applied to medical ethics)
    The party in a principal-agent relationship who is instructed to produce the good or service on the principal's behalf — in the medical context, the doctor
    causal pathway(in action theory)
    The chain of events that directly connects a person's beliefs and desires to their actual behavior—basically the cause-and-effect route from thought to action.
    deviance (in causal contexts)(in action theory)
    When something goes wrong or unexpected happens in the normal cause-and-effect chain, so the action doesn't happen the way it was supposed to.
    deviant causal chain problem(background concept in action theory)
    A famous puzzle in philosophy: sometimes your beliefs and desires cause behavior in a weird or roundabout way, raising the question of whether it still counts as an intentional action.
    operative belief-desire pair(in action theory)
    The specific combination of what someone actually believes and what they actually want that is actively driving their behavior right now.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Causation1 linkedMoral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    Action requires agent self-understanding: if an agent can describe their behavio...Agent description cannot override objective causal facts: self-interpretation do...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    Behavior caused by beliefs and desires in a deviant causal chain is not an actio...
    Deviant causal chains still realize the agent's intentions: when beliefs and des...
    +3 moreShow less
    Matching descriptions to beliefs/desires is necessary but insufficient: a climbe...Restricting action to 'normal' causation arbitrarily excludes cases where agents...This view risks making too much count as action: any behavior an agent can ratio...