Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If the binary presence-or-absence of a dependence relatio... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The worry about guaranteeing mutual exclusiveness and joint exhaustiveness of ontological categories can be met by defining categories in ways that logically guarantee these properties.

    If the binary presence-or-absence of a dependence relation admits of borderline cases or gradations, as Aristotle's analogical predication and contemporary truthmaker theorists like Lowe argue, the law of excluded middle does not straightforwardly apply to yield exhaustive disjoint categories.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Dependence relations in nature exhibit continuous variation (e.g., partial dependence, degrees of existential dependence) rather than sharp binary transitions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Classical logic's law of excluded middle presupposes precise boundaries that many real dependence phenomena lack, making it descriptively inadequate here.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Aristotle's analogical predication successfully captured graded similarities in being without collapsing distinctions, showing binaries needn't be exhaustive.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Borderline cases in dependence may reflect epistemic limitations, not metaphysical indeterminacy—the relation itself remains binary even if unknowable.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Rejecting excluded middle for dependence relations requires justifying why metaphysical relations differ from logical principles governing all propositions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Truthmaker theory's own framework requires determinate truth-conditions; vagueness in dependence itself undermines rather than supports the theory's coherence.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    Aristotle
    Aristotle was an ancient Greek philosopher who lived over 2,000 years ago and is one of the most influential thinkers in Western history. He studied nearly every subject—from animals and plants to politics and ethics—and developed practical ways of thinking that shaped how people understand the world. His ideas on logic, nature, and how to live a good life are still taught and debated today because he focused on observing the real world rather than just abstract theories.
    Binary(as used in logic and epistemology)
    Something that only has two options or states—like an on/off switch, with no middle ground.
    Borderline cases(The unclear middle ground between definite heaps and definite non-heaps)
    Situations where it's genuinely unclear whether a label applies—like wondering if 500 grains of sand count as a heap or not.
    Exhaustive disjoint categories(the kind of clear-cut division the law of excluded middle supposedly creates)
    A set of groups that cover all possibilities with no overlap—like 'animals' split into 'mammals' and 'non-mammals' with nothing fitting both.
    Gradations(ways that dependence relations might exist in degrees)
    Small, continuous steps or degrees of difference, like a spectrum from light to dark rather than just black or white.
    Lowe(the subject of this philosophical critique)
    E.J. Lowe is a contemporary philosopher who developed a theory about what exists in the world, particularly focusing on objects and their properties.
    Truthmaker theorists(contemporary philosophers being grouped with Aristotle)
    Philosophers who believe that true statements must be made true by something real in the world, and they study how that relationship works.
    analogical predication(Aquinas's theory for how positive terms like 'good' can be truly applied to God despite divine transcendence.)
    A mode of predication in which a term applied to God has a sense that is neither univocal with nor purely equivocal to its creaturely use; instead, the creaturely property preexists in God in a higher mode.
    dependence relation(used in metaphysics)
    A relationship where one thing relies on another thing to exist or happen—if the second thing didn't happen, the first couldn't happen either.
    law of excluded middle(Classical logic; shown to be incompatible with smooth infinitesimal analysis)
    The classical logical principle that for any proposition, either the proposition or its negation holds — applied here as: every real number is either equal to 0 or not equal to 0.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedModality & Possibility1 linked

    Related

    Aristotle's analogical predication successfully captured graded similarities in ...Borderline cases in dependence may reflect epistemic limitations, not metaphysic...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    Classical logic's law of excluded middle presupposes precise boundaries that man...
    Dependence relations in nature exhibit continuous variation (e.g., partial depen...
    +3 moreShow less
    Rejecting excluded middle for dependence relations requires justifying why metap...The worry about guaranteeing mutual exclusiveness and joint exhaustiveness of on...Truthmaker theory's own framework requires determinate truth-conditions; vaguene...