Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that If the co-existence of God and evil is logically possible, then evil's existence does not generate a 'serious argument' but merely an emotional or probabilistic challenge.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Logical possibility alone doesn't resolve the evidential problem: our actual world contains vast suffering, not merely possible worlds.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Distinguishing 'serious' arguments from emotional ones prejudges what counts as philosophical rigor; suffering's reality *is* evidence.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Inductive arguments from observed evil can be rigorous and 'serious' regardless of whether deductive contradictions exist.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Logical possibility and metaphysical reality are distinct; showing co-existence is logically possible undermines deductive arguments.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The problem of evil's force depends on necessity claims; if God+evil is merely improbable rather than contradictory, it's not a proof.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Emotional or probabilistic challenges, while important, carry less argumentative weight than logical demonstrations of contradiction.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.