Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that If the cosmos is identical to God or Nature (Deus sive Natura), attributing contingency to it conflates modal categories that apply only to finite modes.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Contingency describes possibility of non-existence; this applies to any entity regardless of scale—even infinite wholes could be other.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The cosmos exhibits genuine physical indeterminacy (quantum mechanics); denying this contingency requires empirical refutation, not logic.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Self-causation (causa sui) is conceptually incoherent whether infinite or finite; it doesn't resolve the contingency problem.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Necessity and contingency are relational concepts defined by dependence on external causes; the infinite whole has no external cause.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Spinoza's substance is self-caused (causa sui) and self-determined; these attributes are incompatible with contingency by definition.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Applying finite-world modal logic to the infinite totality commits a category mistake, like using 'heavy' to describe numbers.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.