Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If the derivation view is correct, then there is some con... — Carmelics
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Combining the derivation view with the claim that proposition (14) is necessary and a posteriori leads to a contradiction.

    If the derivation view is correct, then there is some contingent and a posteriori statement S# that logically entails proposition (14).

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    A statement that is both necessary and a priori would contradict the a posterior...Combining the derivation view with the claim that proposition (14) is necessary ...If S# logically entails (14), then by logical equivalence ('If C, then if A then...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    On the derivation view, necessary a posteriori truths can be derived a priori fr...

    Similar

    Combining the derivation view with the claim that proposition (14) is ...87%On the derivation view, necessary a posteriori truths can be derived a...86%It is true that a derivation for any proposition can be produced from ...79%What is established a posteriori is only that a particular base obtain...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: physicalism
    View source passageHide passage
    The appeal to the necessary a posteriori is on the surface an attractive one, but it is also controversial. One problem arises from the fact that Kripke’s idea that there are necessary and a posteriori truths can be interpreted in two rather different ways. On the first interpretation — I will call it the derivation view — while there are necessary a posteriori truths, these truths can be derived a priori from truths which are a posteriori and contingent. On the second interpretation — I will ca

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective