If the Dharmadhātu lacks substantial existence, the claim that it is 'devoid of evil and virtue' attributes a real property to a non-entity, which is itself a category error the Prāsaṅgika school explicitly rejects.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Category error(as used in logic and philosophy of language): A logical mistake where you apply a rule or concept to something it doesn't actually fit, like using a math formula on a poem.
Devoid of evil and virtue(as used in ethics and Buddhist philosophy): Completely lacking moral qualities—neither good nor bad, like saying a rock has no morality.
Dharmadhātu(Contrasted with the conditioned realm of karma; literally 'inconsequential' in that it has no consequences.): The Realm of Reality; the unconditioned, actionless ultimate reality that produces no causal results.
Prāsaṅgika school(as used in Buddhist philosophy and metaphysics): A major school of Buddhist philosophy (especially Tibetan Buddhism) that argues reality is ultimately empty of independent existence and is skeptical of making positive claims about what things are.

Based on where you are in your exploration