Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If the dichotomy of bodies and minds is not exhaustive, the elimination of body as first mover does not entail mind is the only remaining candidate.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Any purported third category ultimately depends on physical or mental substrates to have causal efficacy.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The claim conflates logical possibility with metaphysical plausibility; other candidates lack explanatory power.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
If bodies and minds exhaust what actually exists, the dichotomy's non-exhaustiveness is merely conceptual, not ontological.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Ontological categories (physical, mental, abstract, relational) exist beyond the body-mind dichotomy.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Excluding one category from causation doesn't logically eliminate all other categories by necessity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Examples like mathematical truths or social structures causally influence events without being body or mind.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.