Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that If the divine mind is wholly incomprehensible, all positive theological claims—including claims about God's goodness or power—become semantically vacuous.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Incomprehensibility of essence ≠ incomprehensibility of all attributes; we may understand relational properties without grasping inner nature.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Negative theology shows meaningful discourse about God possible via negation and analogy without claiming full conceptual grasp.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Semantical vacuity requires inability to distinguish truth from falsehood; mystery alone permits meaningful, justified affirmations and denials.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Meaning requires some grasp of referent's properties; total incomprehensibility precludes this grasp entirely.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Positive claims assert determinate properties; if divine mind transcends all determination, such claims are false or meaningless.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.We cannot coherently apply human concepts like 'goodness' to wholly transcendent beings without vacuity or equivocation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42