Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If the early/late debate originates in empirical constrai... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→At least some problems with the early/late debate stem from an assumption about the linearity of the processes that support personal-level thinking, not from an assumption about linearity of neural processing per se.

    If the early/late debate originates in empirical constraints on neural bandwidth (Cherry 1953, dichotic listening), then linearity of personal-level processing is a downstream inference, not the generative assumption.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Cherry 1953(experimental psychology history)
    A famous psychology experiment by Colin Cherry that studied how people listen to two conversations at once, foundational to understanding attention.
    Empirical constraints(what limits which theories are acceptable)
    Limitations and requirements that come from actual observations and experiences in the real world, rather than just from pure thinking.
    dichotic listening(psychology experiment)
    An experiment where a person hears two different things at the same time (one in each ear) and must focus on one while ignoring the other.
    downstream inference(logic and philosophy of science)
    A conclusion we reach as a side effect of something else, rather than something we started with as an assumption.
    early/late debate

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    (Cognitive psychology; specifically the question of whether selection occurs before or after semantic processing)
    The debate between early selection theory and late selection theory about the stage in perceptual processing at which unattended information is filtered out.
    generative assumption(epistemology/philosophy of science)
    A basic starting belief that we use to create or build other ideas from; the foundation we begin with before drawing conclusions.
    linearity of personal-level processing(philosophy of mind)
    The idea that human thought happens in a straight sequence—one thought leads to the next in order—rather than all jumbled together.
    neural bandwidth(cognitive science)
    The amount of information your brain can process at any given moment—like how much data a internet connection can handle.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Consciousness & Mind1 linkedPerception1 linked

    Related

    At least some problems with the early/late debate stem from an assumption about ...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective