If the extensional model revises rather than simultaneously holds conflicting contents, P3's claim of forced simultaneous contradiction is false, and the alleged advantage of retentional models dissolves.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Extensional model(Contrasted with Retentional models; said to struggle with temporal illusions involving apparent retro-active causation.): A theory of time consciousness on which each stimulus is represented exactly once, so conflicting perceptual data about the same moment t produces contradictory experiences.
P3(as referenced in formal logic or philosophical argumentation): A specific rule or principle (probably the third one in a list) being discussed in the larger argument.
Retentional models(in philosophy of time and perception): A theory about how our brains hold onto memories of things we just perceived a moment ago, so we can experience events as connected over a short stretch of time rather than isolated snapshots.
conflicting contents(as used in philosophy of mind): Different pieces of information or experiences that contradict each other or cannot both be true at the same time.

Based on where you are in your exploration