If the full-support condition in P2 is not a necessary feature of admissibility but an artifact of orthodox Bayesianism, the logical gap between non-domination and admissibility that grounds the claim does not hold generally.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
(Provides the truth conditions for proposition (7), identified as proposition (7): George Bush does not exist.)
The principle that proposition (7) is true if and only if George Bush does not exist — a modalized instance of the Tarski truth-schema 's is true iff s'.
admissibility(Game-theoretic decision theory; contrasted with the weaker condition of not being strictly dominated)
A strategy is admissible if it is a best response to a belief (probability measure) that assigns positive probability to every possible choice of the opponents — i.e., a full-support probability measure
artifact(Contrasted with real cellular structures in evaluating microscopy results)
A feature in a micrograph produced by the methods of preparation rather than by actual structures in the cell
non-domination(Used to characterize the protective function of federal arrangements)
A condition in which minority groups or nations are secured against arbitrary or undue exercise of power by central authorities.