Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If the historical origin of hearsay and similar rules ref... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→A rule-based approach to admissibility of evidence will not undermine the aim of rectitude of decision in the long run

    If the historical origin of hearsay and similar rules reflects adversarial procedural interests rather than reliability concerns, their aggregate epistemic benefits cannot be assumed without independent empirical verification.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Epistemic
    "Epistemic" relates to knowledge—how we know things, what counts as knowledge, and whether we can trust what we believe to be true. It comes from the Greek word for knowledge and is used to describe questions about the reliability and validity of our beliefs and understanding. For example, "epistemic humility" means acknowledging the limits of what you can actually know for certain.
    Reliability concerns(as used in epistemology and law)
    Worries about whether something will consistently give you accurate, trustworthy results.
    epistemology(Contrasted with purely descriptive scientific inquiry)
    A normative enterprise that tells us how we ought to reason from evidence and how we ought to justify our beliefs, as distinct from merely describing how we do reason or justify beliefs
    hearsay(Mohist epistemology)
    The reports of other people, treated by the Mohists as a source of knowledge on a par with observation and explanation

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Consequentialism1 linkedJustice & Punishment1 linked

    Related

    A rule-based approach to admissibility of evidence will not undermine the aim of...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective