Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If the inferential step in a judgment-sequence underdeter... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Every inference uniquely determines a corresponding argument

    If the inferential step in a judgment-sequence underdetermines which logical rule is applied, multiple distinct argument structures—with different propositional connectives—map onto the same inference.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Judgment-sequence(as used in logic)
    A chain of thoughts or claims where each one builds on or follows from the previous one.
    Logical rule(as used in formal logic)
    A formal principle that explains how to correctly move from one claim to another in reasoning (for example, 'if A is true and A leads to B, then B must be true').
    Map onto(as used in the philosophical argument)
    To correspond to or match up with something else—in this case, the argument is that legal proof standards correspond to specific numerical probability percentages.
    argument structure(Dung's formal framework for defeasible reasoning)
    An ordered pair ⟨A, B⟩ where A is a set of arguments and B is a binary relation on A representing the attack relation between arguments
    inference

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    (Nyāya epistemology)
    A component of epistemology in Nyāya philosophy; a veritable inference yields knowledge about the world and must have premises that are themselves known
    inferential step(in logic and reasoning)
    A logical move where you use what you already know to figure out something new—essentially drawing a conclusion from evidence.
    propositional connectives(the other type of logical tool the Stoics inherited analysis of)
    Words and logical operators that join simple statements together, like 'and,' 'or,' and 'if-then'—they determine how complex ideas relate to each other.
    underdetermines(logic and language)
    Doesn't fully decide or pin down; leaves open multiple possible interpretations because there isn't enough information visible to choose just one.

    Connections

    1 linked claim · 2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedPhilosophy of Language1 linked
    Every inference uniquely determines a corresponding argument

    Related

    Every inference uniquely determines a corresponding argument

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective