Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If the law of free fall were purely definitional, it coul... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The law of free fall cannot be refuted by experiment alone because it functions as a definition of 'free fall'.

    If the law of free fall were purely definitional, it could not explain why bodies deviate from predicted paths near massive rotating objects, yet general relativity does explain this.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Deviate(as in whether a player can rationally choose a different action)
    To break from an expected pattern or strategy; to do something different from what was predicted or planned.
    General relativity(as used in physics)
    Einstein's theory explaining how gravity works by describing space and time as flexible, bendable things affected by massive objects like stars and planets.
    definitional(as used in philosophy of language)
    Serving as a complete and exact explanation of what something is, rather than just a partial description.
    explain(Used to distinguish causal explanation from mechanistic explanation in the context of epidemiology.)
    To account for differences in observed outcomes by reference to a known causal factor, without necessarily specifying the underlying biological or physical mechanism.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    law of free fall(describes a scientific principle being discussed)
    A physics rule that predicts how fast objects fall to the ground based only on gravity and time, without considering other forces.
    massive rotating objects(examples of situations where the simple law of free fall fails)
    Very heavy things that are spinning, like planets or black holes; used here as an example of something that affects how gravity works.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedPhilosophy of Language1 linked

    Related

    The law of free fall cannot be refuted by experiment alone because it functions ...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective