If the loose league is structurally incapable of generating compliance, reinterpreting it as a transitional stage cannot rescue its coherence without abandoning Kant's own antipathy toward coercive world government.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Antipathy(describing Kant's philosophical opposition to forced world government): A strong feeling of dislike or opposition toward something.
Coercive world government(describing a type of global authority that Kant opposed): A single government ruling the entire world that forces people to obey through threats, punishment, or violence rather than consent.
Compliance(describing whether a league can get its members to actually follow its rules): When people follow rules, laws, or agreements because they accept them (not just because they're forced to).
Kant / Kantian(as the philosopher whose theory is being discussed): Immanuel Kant was an 18th-century German philosopher who argued that our minds actively shape how we experience the world, rather than passively receiving it. 'Kantian' means relating to his ideas.

Based on where you are in your exploration