Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If the pre-social human condition was one of independence and contentment, then society is a contingent invention, not a biological necessity.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Even pre-social humans lived in family groups and coalitions—minimally social structures essential for survival and reproduction.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Human infants require years of intensive care; solitary independence is impossible, making some social arrangement biologically necessary.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Contentment is subjective and unverifiable in prehistoric contexts; attributing it requires unfounded assumptions about ancestral psychology.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Archaeological evidence shows humans thrived in small, dispersed groups for millennia before complex societies emerged.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If humans required society biologically, infants raised without social contact would develop normally, but they demonstrably do not.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Many human capacities (language, reason, self-awareness) function independently of societal structures, suggesting society amplifies rather than enables them.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.