Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    If the proof's core strategy is salvageable under modest ... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The proof that the principle of Induction can be derived without the axiom of reducibility in a modified theory of types is faulty.

    If the proof's core strategy is salvageable under modest technical revision, the fault is in the execution rather than the foundational claim that reducibility is dispensable for induction.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Core strategy(in argumentation)
    The main approach or central idea behind an argument, as opposed to the smaller details.
    Dispensable(in philosophy)
    Not absolutely necessary; able to be removed or done without while still having a working system.
    Salvageable(in philosophy)
    Able to be saved or rescued; in this case, whether a flawed argument can still work if you fix the problems.
    Technical revision(in logic)
    Small, specific fixes or improvements made to the precise details of an argument without changing its basic idea.
    foundational claim(as a fundamental assumption in philosophy or logic)
    A basic statement or principle that everything else in an argument or theory is supposed to rest on or depend from.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    induction(Offered as the mechanism behind empirical universality.)
    The empirical method by which observations are generalized into rules; yields only comparative or assumed universality, not strict universality.
    proof(Frege's formal system; the definition still used by logicians today)
    Any finite sequence of statements such that each statement is either an axiom of the formal system or follows from previous members of the sequence by a valid rule of inference.
    reducibility(Computability theory; used to compare the relative difficulty of decision problems.)
    Problem P1 is reducible to problem P2 if a solution of P2 immediately yields a solution of P1.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedPhilosophy of Language1 linked

    Related

    The proof that the principle of Induction can be derived without the axiom of re...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective