Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    If the respondent evaluates an irrelevant proposition on ... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Relevance of a proposition in an obligations disputation must be determined on the basis of all answers given so far, not solely on the positum alone.

    If the respondent evaluates an irrelevant proposition on the first step, that answer must be taken into account in determining whether later propositions follow or are incompatible.

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge

    Key Terms

    Follow (in logical terms)(as used in reasoning and logic)
    When one statement must be true if another statement is true; a logical consequence or result of what came before.
    incompatible(as used to describe conflicting demands or responsibilities)
    Unable to exist or work together at the same time; conflicting with each other.
    irrelevant proposition(Medieval obligations theory)

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    A proposition that neither follows from nor is incompatible with the relevant set of commitments in the disputation at the time of evaluation.
    proposition(Used in the context of a semantic theory sensitive to differences in subject matter.)
    The content expressed by a sentence, individuated at least in part by the subject matter of the sentence and the contents of its subsentential expressions.

    Related

    On the first step after the positum, relevance is based on whether a proposition...Relevance of a proposition in an obligations disputation must be determined on t...The respondent must ensure all answers remain consistent as a set throughout the...

    Similar

    Granting an irrelevant proposition can make subsequent propositions re...80%A proposition must be denied as incompatibly relevant if it is incompa...79%On the first step after the positum, relevance is based on whether a p...79%Some propositions make reference to what the respondent has granted or...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: obligationes
    View source passageHide passage
    The rule concerning irrelevant propositions is generally accepted by all medieval authors writing on obligations, but in importantly different exact versions. We will come back to some of these versions in the following, but first we must make clear about Burley’s version. He puts special attention to the following question: a proposition is relevant if it follows or is incompatible, but follows from exactly what, or is incompatible with exactly what? As Burley sees it, this relevance must be de

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective